View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-16-2005, 04:43 AM
Richard Spooner Richard Spooner is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: 03-14-2005
Posts: 31
Counterintuitive copying

Whilst I consider UltraRecall the best thing since sliced bread, the following issues causes me a little frustration.

This is best described with a little picture, see attached.

If 'item 3' holds a copy of 'item 1' and a link to 'item 2' I would expect that a copy of 'item 3' would contain the same, ie a copy of 'item 1' and a link to 'item 2'.

As can be seen from the picture this is not the case, the copy of 'item 3' holds a copy of 'item 1' and a copy of 'item 2'.

Is this correct? Are there any advantages to the current implementation?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote