#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Copy part of the web page (rich text + pictures)
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, it's fine as it is, but if they provide option to edit html inside UR, where I suppose would be easier to drag/drop directly from website (which doesnt work with rtf at the moment), then the user would be able to choose the format of items ... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
An HTML solution is not without a lot of difficulties itself. HTML can be rendered easily enough with an embedded browser--but you probably have sometimes observed the difference in rendering between Firefox and IE...very similar to the RTF problem.
See Difficulties in achieving WYSIWYG at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_editor Editing is a big problem...not so hard to implement if your target user population likes to input the markup tags in a text editor....but are embedded WYSIWYG HTML editors as well developed and as available as embedded RTF? Otherwise it's the big guns...Word processors or specialized HTML editors like MS Frontpage (still installed with Office?), Nvu (nolonger developed?), Mozilla Composer, etc. So it seems to me - User expectations are high and the technologies to met them are flawed. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
it's just that recently I started working with google notebook when I'm off my pc, which works beautifully with web page snippets (I mark sth inside firefox, small plus sign appears and clicking on that adds to my notes, which you can then export to google doc), so I thought it shouldn't be a big problem for Kinook to make it work inside UR if the base item format was html. I'm still missing Kinook's point of view on all this ... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|